Evidence before hype
The Impact of AI follows the original evidence, separates observed effects from promises, and explains what each development means for people around the world.
Become a founding reader
Join the founding list for selected AI reports, practical implications and direct links to the original evidence.
Free · No paywall · Leave at any time
Start with the records
Every report carries a stable evidence record, confidence band, source dossier and the next question that still needs answering.
Four-agent teams coordinated complex missions in EVE Frontier, but a prompted saboteur usually blended mistakes with plausible excuses. Separate message-only monitors detected 20–40% at a 5% false-accusation setting, while simulated traders exposed different weaknesses in risk-taking and market prediction.
A peer-reviewed study forecasts electricity demand in Adigrat, Ethiopia, through 2035 with a PSO-optimised neural model. Its total-load error was reported as 0.027%, but the model learned from eight annual observations and was tested on only two.
Managers at 333 Chinese manufacturers who were already using AI and pursuing green product development reported stronger innovation capabilities where AI capability was higher. The cross-sectional survey measured perceptions, not products’ environmental performance or causal impact.
Announcements remain announcements until independent evidence supports the outcome.
Impact records are designed to be updated as studies, incidents and real-world results arrive.
Coverage tracks geography, language, access and who benefits or bears the risk.
The Impact Tracker
Follow claims as their evidence changes instead of losing yesterday’s promises in today’s news cycle.
Explore the tracker